AI Notes: Difference between revisions
From canSAS
No edit summary  | 
				No edit summary  | 
				||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
__TOC__  | __TOC__  | ||
*	Talk  | |||
**	AI is pervasive                                                                                | |||
***	The most impactful AI applications will be outside he facility wall, these mostly demand good, reduced data                                                                                                                  | |||
** Decision ready data                                                                                                          | |||
*** bespoke GUI reduction is unnecessarily user-unfriendly, AND prevents future data-intensive work                                                                                                                              | |||
** Accessible documented API  | |||
*** Magic cable story   | |||
*** We should more regularly support outside decision engines as the 'center of the universe' with the instrument as a subordinate worker       | |||
*	Discussion  | |||
**	Andrew Jackson  | |||
***	Accessible documented API is good, public internet is not going to happen. All instruments should be able to be ‘plugged into’  | |||
** Brian Pauw  | |||
*** Has solution for rolling nexus/NxCansas into scicat   | |||
** Jan Ilavsky  | |||
*** Instrument control from open internet is not going to happen; decision is in wrong hands  | |||
*** Why not just use EPICS?   | |||
****	A: We’ve done that.   | |||
*** People hate tiled/bluesky   | |||
** Unknown person  | |||
*** How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state?  | |||
**** A: This is a problem with the instrument. If the instrument can be put in that state, it’s the instruments problem  | |||
** Unknown Person  | |||
*** How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications?   | |||
**** A: Good important question, no easy answers  | |||
** Adrian Renee  | |||
*** Comment about “center of the universe”. Should be broader. All instruments should be switchable between these two views  | |||
*** How to get the users integrated into the decision making?   | |||
**** A: Human-machine interfaces is important. Code and efforts exists (Tsuchinoko)  | |||
** Brian Pauw  | |||
*** We should support and push for instruments that aren’t the center of the universe   | |||
** Tanny Chavez  | |||
*** Uncertainty quantification?   | |||
**** A: Yes, very important  | |||
Revision as of 17:05, 25 November 2024
Notes from canSAS 2024 AI/ML in SAS Topical Presentation/Discussion
- Talk
- AI is pervasive
- The most impactful AI applications will be outside he facility wall, these mostly demand good, reduced data
 
 - Decision ready data
- bespoke GUI reduction is unnecessarily user-unfriendly, AND prevents future data-intensive work
 
 - Accessible documented API
- Magic cable story
 - We should more regularly support outside decision engines as the 'center of the universe' with the instrument as a subordinate worker
 
 
 - AI is pervasive
 
- Discussion
- Andrew Jackson
- Accessible documented API is good, public internet is not going to happen. All instruments should be able to be ‘plugged into’
 
 - Brian Pauw
- Has solution for rolling nexus/NxCansas into scicat
 
 - Jan Ilavsky
- Instrument control from open internet is not going to happen; decision is in wrong hands
 - Why not just use EPICS?
- A: We’ve done that.
 
 - People hate tiled/bluesky
 
 - Unknown person
- How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state?
- A: This is a problem with the instrument. If the instrument can be put in that state, it’s the instruments problem
 
 
 - How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state?
 - Unknown Person
- How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications?
- A: Good important question, no easy answers
 
 
 - How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications?
 - Adrian Renee
- Comment about “center of the universe”. Should be broader. All instruments should be switchable between these two views
 - How to get the users integrated into the decision making?
- A: Human-machine interfaces is important. Code and efforts exists (Tsuchinoko)
 
 
 - Brian Pauw
- We should support and push for instruments that aren’t the center of the universe
 
 - Tanny Chavez
- Uncertainty quantification?
- A: Yes, very important
 
 
 - Uncertainty quantification?
 
 - Andrew Jackson