cansas multid: Difference between revisions
From canSAS
 (kick-off the multi-dimensional format)  | 
			
(No difference) 
 | 
Revision as of 17:20, 8 May 2008
Note: please keep discussion content on the discussion page. Your contributions may get moved there anyway.
XML standard for reduced small-angle scattering data with multi-dimensional data
Key Points so far
- with the 1D format agreed, we should look at 2D data
 - we should also consider how different we are from NeXus and then why
 - We must address data beyond simple 2D detector patterns (multi-dimensional data)
- kinetic/time-resolved stuff (frames, periods, whatever you call them),
 - other experiments where data is being collected as a function of some variable (temperature, pH, or whatever)
 
 - quite happy to abandon human-readability ... even prepared to consider binary storage!
 - We have benefited a little from [the NeXus] instrument dictionary.
 - The time is now ripe to show the use of HDF for storing multi-dimensional data, only using pure HDF5.
 - Regarding the cansas1d/1.0 XML format:
- table structure used in the 1D format is quite 'tag-heavy' and just will not extend easily.
 - takes a little bit more work to extract the I(Q) data into vectors for use in processing or analysis software.
 
 - For multi-dimensional data in XML, rather than create anew, I chose to model the data structures from a popular commercial application.