First WG Discussion: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<big>'''Notes from canSAS 2024 First Working Group Discussion Session'''</big><br><br> '''Includes:''' * Information and Dissemination * Sample Environments * Grazing Incidence * Reproducibility and Reliability __TOC__ == Notes Start here ==") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== Notes | =Information and Dissemination - Paul Butler (UD/NIST)= | ||
==Notes pre-update== | |||
Discussion on Recruiting students and postdoc, increase participation | |||
* Anna Sokolova (ANSTO): Today’s CanSAS has no virtual attendance - How can more students and PostDocs be brought into the workshop? | |||
* Mu-Ping Nieh (UConn): Suggestion to hold a workshop at University of Connecticut to draw in computer science and engineering students | |||
Discussion on formalizing CanSAS as an organization | |||
* More formal organization with board and voting may make things more complicated | |||
* International Scattering Alliance (Chair: Tim Snow, Treasurer: Andrew Jackson), Non-Profit in Sweden - holds and pays for domain names, membership donations from ESS, university of Uppsala | |||
* No funding means that there are typical registration fees for longer canSAS workshop | |||
* Currently no Donate button, registration underway | |||
* Grants (e.g. NSF may pay for students to travel) | |||
==Notes from Updates== | |||
Current Activities | |||
* Wiki | |||
** Access to request to Paul Butler, will be approved, otherwise bots overrun | |||
** Major effort to upgrade | |||
* Webpages | |||
** Moved to CanSAS github.io | |||
** Simpler to add editors now | |||
** Cansas.org is now “owned” by university | |||
* Mailing list | |||
** Mailman2 version had too high maintenance | |||
** Moved to Google Groups, mostly unused | |||
** SESANS using jicsmail, does not have a generic sign up page ( will look into this) | |||
** New attempt with MailMan3 in progress | |||
* SAS Portal Project | |||
** Software page especially popular (7k/year, 65k/year visits on front page) | |||
* new.smallangles.org - major refactor with updating and porting in process | |||
* Github (cansas), mostly for data formats | |||
* Tutorials, lots of interest, but no-one stepped up to do so under the canSAS organization | |||
* Draft for resolution paper | |||
* Will need help for determining services | |||
==Notes from Discussion== | |||
=Sample Environments - Nick Terrill (Diamond)== | |||
==Notes from Updates== | |||
* Subgroup RheoSAS | |||
** Met with Anton Paar to discuss SAS-Rheometer: Progress towards being able to communicate with | |||
** Interested in doing a (virtual) working group subgroup meeting? | |||
*** EPICS drivers | |||
*** Direct control | |||
*** Quartz cup and bob | |||
*** Email to Katie.Weigandt, dedicated meeting late 2024 or early 2025 | |||
* User brought sample environments | |||
** Problems: Not designed to be integrated, using different operating system, don’t use the right cables, triggered weirdly, user wants all variables saved with the facility data. | |||
** EPICS Integrations - Diamond/ISIS working on this, ESS also experimenting with this (talk to ESS Sample Environments Team) - email Tim Snow | |||
** Link with International Society of Sample Environments | |||
=Notes from Discussion= | |||
Link with International Society of Sample Environments | |||
==Grazing Incidence - Anja Hörmann (BAM)== | |||
=Notes from Updates= | |||
History | |||
Formation in 2015, new iteration in 2024 | |||
Survey | |||
Call for participation - So far 16 answers, open since Jul 18, 2024 | |||
Data set to be published | |||
SANS, and 2 types of SAXS sources are represented | |||
So far only Europe and North America, GISANS | |||
ToDo list: | |||
Contact previously active people | |||
Increase diversity | |||
Finding modus of operandi | |||
Establish Mailing list | |||
GISAS: Any restrictions on the Geometry - Analysis is different for near surface scattering | |||
Notes from Discussion | |||
Annika Stellhorn: Discussion on standards? | |||
Volker Urban (ORNL): Should be more inclusive to have more participation from Neutrons | |||
Reproducibility and Reliability - Adrian Rennie (Uppsala) | |||
Notes from Updates | |||
Used to be called “Standardization” | |||
Do I believe my data and my interpretation? | |||
Joe Klein: Round robin with Grating as potential new standard reference material for momentum transfer | |||
Designed material with 2 characteristic spacings, wants to do round robin before release, Tungsten, primarily for SAXS, prototype available (although some production issues) | |||
Unlabeled SRM 3605, other unknown, well-characterized test sample. | |||
Provide estimated pith for SRM 3605, will return certified calibration | |||
Glassy Carbon round robin - circulated through CanSAS community | |||
Candidates for other test sample | |||
Needs to be replicated | |||
Recruitment for participants | |||
Further standards for intensity or momentum transfer. | |||
Different ways of round robins | |||
Blind can have a use | |||
Revising data reduction, reported again, activity is useful | |||
Talk about reduction in context of round robin | |||
Notes from Discussion | |||
General Discussion | |||
Finished producing some drivers, running on SECoP: The Sample Environment Communication Protocol, ISSE, Octopies, told it does not work. Has been suggested that SECoP will not be interoperable at Oakridge - seems to not be fully standard as a protocol. | |||
EPICS drivers can be quite specific. | |||
Additional layer may be needed | |||
CanSAS: Facility members used to not be nomadic (temporarily the case) - users may not care. | |||
Plug and play | |||
Glen Smales: Data from 17 different instruments, all different - Use of standard format not wide-spread | |||
Andrew Jackson, ESS: Todo on formats: No survey yet | |||
Eliot Gilbert (ANSTO) SASView and Mantid can save reduced data in Cansas Nexus. | |||
Uptake higher at Neutrons, less at synchrotrons | |||
1d data, often put out as ASCII | |||
2d data is more complicated - Laid groundwork is important | |||
Encourage adoption as a community | |||
For synchrotron SAXS, discussion with vendors may be needed. | |||
Yun Liu (NIST): Is current practice viable for weak scattering? Push for throughput. Push limit in regards to intensity? Background is dominating in case of wake scatterers | |||
Reliance on calibration by vendors - understanding of typical calibration problems not uniform | |||
Liz Kelley (NCNR): Errors in terms of counting statistics? | |||
Counting statistics is easy to account for, but other sources of errors are difficult to capture. Sharing of best practice would be great. | |||
Elliot Gilbert (ANSTO): Link of existing videos? | |||
Original idea of the portal was to fill in blanks and link to existing resources. |
Revision as of 15:38, 9 November 2024
Notes from canSAS 2024 First Working Group Discussion Session
Includes:
- Information and Dissemination
- Sample Environments
- Grazing Incidence
- Reproducibility and Reliability
Information and Dissemination - Paul Butler (UD/NIST)
Notes pre-update
Discussion on Recruiting students and postdoc, increase participation
- Anna Sokolova (ANSTO): Today’s CanSAS has no virtual attendance - How can more students and PostDocs be brought into the workshop?
- Mu-Ping Nieh (UConn): Suggestion to hold a workshop at University of Connecticut to draw in computer science and engineering students
Discussion on formalizing CanSAS as an organization
- More formal organization with board and voting may make things more complicated
- International Scattering Alliance (Chair: Tim Snow, Treasurer: Andrew Jackson), Non-Profit in Sweden - holds and pays for domain names, membership donations from ESS, university of Uppsala
- No funding means that there are typical registration fees for longer canSAS workshop
- Currently no Donate button, registration underway
- Grants (e.g. NSF may pay for students to travel)
Notes from Updates
Current Activities
- Wiki
- Access to request to Paul Butler, will be approved, otherwise bots overrun
- Major effort to upgrade
- Webpages
- Moved to CanSAS github.io
- Simpler to add editors now
- Cansas.org is now “owned” by university
- Mailing list
- Mailman2 version had too high maintenance
- Moved to Google Groups, mostly unused
- SESANS using jicsmail, does not have a generic sign up page ( will look into this)
- New attempt with MailMan3 in progress
- SAS Portal Project
- Software page especially popular (7k/year, 65k/year visits on front page)
- new.smallangles.org - major refactor with updating and porting in process
- Github (cansas), mostly for data formats
- Tutorials, lots of interest, but no-one stepped up to do so under the canSAS organization
- Draft for resolution paper
- Will need help for determining services
Notes from Discussion
Sample Environments - Nick Terrill (Diamond)=
Notes from Updates
- Subgroup RheoSAS
- Met with Anton Paar to discuss SAS-Rheometer: Progress towards being able to communicate with
- Interested in doing a (virtual) working group subgroup meeting?
- EPICS drivers
- Direct control
- Quartz cup and bob
- Email to Katie.Weigandt, dedicated meeting late 2024 or early 2025
- User brought sample environments
- Problems: Not designed to be integrated, using different operating system, don’t use the right cables, triggered weirdly, user wants all variables saved with the facility data.
- EPICS Integrations - Diamond/ISIS working on this, ESS also experimenting with this (talk to ESS Sample Environments Team) - email Tim Snow
- Link with International Society of Sample Environments
Notes from Discussion
Link with International Society of Sample Environments
Grazing Incidence - Anja Hörmann (BAM)
Notes from Updates
History Formation in 2015, new iteration in 2024 Survey Call for participation - So far 16 answers, open since Jul 18, 2024 Data set to be published SANS, and 2 types of SAXS sources are represented So far only Europe and North America, GISANS ToDo list: Contact previously active people Increase diversity Finding modus of operandi Establish Mailing list GISAS: Any restrictions on the Geometry - Analysis is different for near surface scattering Notes from Discussion
Annika Stellhorn: Discussion on standards? Volker Urban (ORNL): Should be more inclusive to have more participation from Neutrons
Reproducibility and Reliability - Adrian Rennie (Uppsala) Notes from Updates Used to be called “Standardization” Do I believe my data and my interpretation? Joe Klein: Round robin with Grating as potential new standard reference material for momentum transfer Designed material with 2 characteristic spacings, wants to do round robin before release, Tungsten, primarily for SAXS, prototype available (although some production issues) Unlabeled SRM 3605, other unknown, well-characterized test sample. Provide estimated pith for SRM 3605, will return certified calibration Glassy Carbon round robin - circulated through CanSAS community Candidates for other test sample Needs to be replicated Recruitment for participants Further standards for intensity or momentum transfer. Different ways of round robins Blind can have a use Revising data reduction, reported again, activity is useful Talk about reduction in context of round robin Notes from Discussion
General Discussion
Finished producing some drivers, running on SECoP: The Sample Environment Communication Protocol, ISSE, Octopies, told it does not work. Has been suggested that SECoP will not be interoperable at Oakridge - seems to not be fully standard as a protocol.
EPICS drivers can be quite specific.
Additional layer may be needed
CanSAS: Facility members used to not be nomadic (temporarily the case) - users may not care. Plug and play Glen Smales: Data from 17 different instruments, all different - Use of standard format not wide-spread Andrew Jackson, ESS: Todo on formats: No survey yet Eliot Gilbert (ANSTO) SASView and Mantid can save reduced data in Cansas Nexus. Uptake higher at Neutrons, less at synchrotrons 1d data, often put out as ASCII 2d data is more complicated - Laid groundwork is important Encourage adoption as a community For synchrotron SAXS, discussion with vendors may be needed.
Yun Liu (NIST): Is current practice viable for weak scattering? Push for throughput. Push limit in regards to intensity? Background is dominating in case of wake scatterers Reliance on calibration by vendors - understanding of typical calibration problems not uniform
Liz Kelley (NCNR): Errors in terms of counting statistics? Counting statistics is easy to account for, but other sources of errors are difficult to capture. Sharing of best practice would be great.
Elliot Gilbert (ANSTO): Link of existing videos? Original idea of the portal was to fill in blanks and link to existing resources.