First WG Discussion: Difference between revisions

From canSAS
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 57: Line 57:
** EPICS Integrations - Diamond/ISIS working on this, ESS also experimenting with this (talk to ESS Sample Environments Team) - email Tim Snow
** EPICS Integrations - Diamond/ISIS working on this, ESS also experimenting with this (talk to ESS Sample Environments Team) - email Tim Snow
** Link with International Society of Sample Environments
** Link with International Society of Sample Environments
=Notes from Discussion=
==Notes from Discussion==
Link with International Society of Sample Environments
Link with International Society of Sample Environments


==Grazing Incidence - Anja Hörmann (BAM)==
=Grazing Incidence - Anja Hörmann (BAM)=
=Notes from Updates=
==Notes from Updates==
History
'''History'''
Formation in 2015, new iteration in 2024
Formation in 2015, new iteration in 2024
Survey  
Survey  
Call for participation - So far 16 answers, open since Jul 18, 2024
* Call for participation - So far 16 answers, open since Jul 18, 2024
Data set to be published
* Data set to be published
SANS, and 2 types of SAXS sources are represented
* SANS, and 2 types of SAXS sources are represented
So far only Europe and North America, GISANS
* So far only Europe and North America, GISANS
ToDo list:
'''ToDo list:'''
Contact previously active people
* Contact previously active people
Increase diversity
* Increase diversity
Finding modus of operandi  
* Finding modus of operandi  
Establish Mailing list  
* Establish Mailing list  
GISAS: Any restrictions on the Geometry - Analysis is different for near surface scattering
==Notes from Discussion==
Notes from Discussion
* Paul Butler(NIST):Any restrictions on the Geometry - Analysis is different for near surface scattering than for evanescent wave
* Annika Stellhorn(ESS): Discussion on standards?
* Volker Urban (ORNL): Should be more inclusive to have more participation from Neutrons


Annika Stellhorn: Discussion on standards?
=Reproducibility and Reliability - Adrian Rennie (Uppsala)==
Volker Urban (ORNL): Should be more inclusive to have more participation from Neutrons
=Notes from Updates=
 
* Used to be called “Standardization”
Reproducibility and Reliability - Adrian Rennie (Uppsala)
* Do I believe my data and my interpretation?
Notes from Updates
* Joe Klein: Round robin with Grating as potential new standard reference material for momentum transfer
Used to be called “Standardization”
** Designed material with 2 characteristic spacings, wants to do round robin before release, Tungsten, primarily for SAXS, prototype available (although some production issues)
Do I believe my data and my interpretation?
** Unlabeled SRM 3605, other unknown, well-characterized test sample.
Joe Klein: Round robin with Grating as potential new standard reference material for momentum transfer
** Provide estimated pith for SRM 3605, will return certified calibration
Designed material with 2 characteristic spacings, wants to do round robin before release, Tungsten, primarily for SAXS, prototype available (although some production issues)
* Glassy Carbon round robin - circulated through CanSAS community
Unlabeled SRM 3605, other unknown, well-characterized test sample.
* Candidates for other test sample
Provide estimated pith for SRM 3605, will return certified calibration
** Needs to be reproducible
Glassy Carbon round robin - circulated through CanSAS community
* Recruitment of participants
Candidates for other test sample
* Further standards for intensity or momentum transfer?
Needs to be replicated
* Different ways of round robins
Recruitment for participants
** Blind can have a use
Further standards for intensity or momentum transfer.
** Revising data reduction, reported again, activity is useful
Different ways of round robins
* Talk about reduction in context of round robin
Blind can have a use
==Notes from Discussion==
Revising data reduction, reported again, activity is useful
Talk about reduction in context of round robin
Notes from Discussion




General Discussion
=General Discussion=
Finished producing some drivers, running on SECoP: The Sample Environment Communication Protocol, ISSE, Octopies, told it does not work. Has been suggested that SECoP will not be interoperable at Oakridge - seems to not be fully standard as a protocol.
Finished producing some drivers, running on SECoP: The Sample Environment Communication Protocol, ISSE, Octopies, told it does not work. Has been suggested that SECoP will not be interoperable at Oakridge - seems to not be fully standard as a protocol.
EPICS drivers can be quite specific.  
EPICS drivers can be quite specific.  

Revision as of 15:50, 9 November 2024

Notes from canSAS 2024 First Working Group Discussion Session

Includes:

  • Information and Dissemination
  • Sample Environments
  • Grazing Incidence
  • Reproducibility and Reliability

Information and Dissemination - Paul Butler (UD/NIST)

Notes pre-update

Discussion on Recruiting students and postdoc, increase participation

  • Anna Sokolova (ANSTO): Today’s CanSAS has no virtual attendance - How can more students and PostDocs be brought into the workshop?
  • Mu-Ping Nieh (UConn): Suggestion to hold a workshop at University of Connecticut to draw in computer science and engineering students

Discussion on formalizing CanSAS as an organization

  • More formal organization with board and voting may make things more complicated
  • International Scattering Alliance (Chair: Tim Snow, Treasurer: Andrew Jackson), Non-Profit in Sweden - holds and pays for domain names, membership donations from ESS, university of Uppsala
  • No funding means that there are typical registration fees for longer canSAS workshop
  • Currently no Donate button, registration underway
  • Grants (e.g. NSF may pay for students to travel)

Notes from Updates

Current Activities

  • Wiki
    • Access to request to Paul Butler, will be approved, otherwise bots overrun
    • Major effort to upgrade
  • Webpages
    • Moved to CanSAS github.io
    • Simpler to add editors now
    • Cansas.org is now “owned” by university
  • Mailing list
    • Mailman2 version had too high maintenance
    • Moved to Google Groups, mostly unused
    • SESANS using jicsmail, does not have a generic sign up page ( will look into this)
    • New attempt with MailMan3 in progress
  • SAS Portal Project
    • Software page especially popular (7k/year, 65k/year visits on front page)
  • new.smallangles.org - major refactor with updating and porting in process
  • Github (cansas), mostly for data formats
  • Tutorials, lots of interest, but no-one stepped up to do so under the canSAS organization
  • Draft for resolution paper
  • Will need help for determining services

Notes from Discussion

Sample Environments - Nick Terrill (Diamond)=

Notes from Updates

  • Subgroup RheoSAS
    • Met with Anton Paar to discuss SAS-Rheometer: Progress towards being able to communicate with
    • Interested in doing a (virtual) working group subgroup meeting?
      • EPICS drivers
      • Direct control
      • Quartz cup and bob
      • Email to Katie.Weigandt, dedicated meeting late 2024 or early 2025
  • User brought sample environments
    • Problems: Not designed to be integrated, using different operating system, don’t use the right cables, triggered weirdly, user wants all variables saved with the facility data.
    • EPICS Integrations - Diamond/ISIS working on this, ESS also experimenting with this (talk to ESS Sample Environments Team) - email Tim Snow
    • Link with International Society of Sample Environments

Notes from Discussion

Link with International Society of Sample Environments

Grazing Incidence - Anja Hörmann (BAM)

Notes from Updates

History Formation in 2015, new iteration in 2024 Survey

  • Call for participation - So far 16 answers, open since Jul 18, 2024
  • Data set to be published
  • SANS, and 2 types of SAXS sources are represented
  • So far only Europe and North America, GISANS

ToDo list:

  • Contact previously active people
  • Increase diversity
  • Finding modus of operandi
  • Establish Mailing list

Notes from Discussion

  • Paul Butler(NIST):Any restrictions on the Geometry - Analysis is different for near surface scattering than for evanescent wave
  • Annika Stellhorn(ESS): Discussion on standards?
  • Volker Urban (ORNL): Should be more inclusive to have more participation from Neutrons

Reproducibility and Reliability - Adrian Rennie (Uppsala)=

Notes from Updates

  • Used to be called “Standardization”
  • Do I believe my data and my interpretation?
  • Joe Klein: Round robin with Grating as potential new standard reference material for momentum transfer
    • Designed material with 2 characteristic spacings, wants to do round robin before release, Tungsten, primarily for SAXS, prototype available (although some production issues)
    • Unlabeled SRM 3605, other unknown, well-characterized test sample.
    • Provide estimated pith for SRM 3605, will return certified calibration
  • Glassy Carbon round robin - circulated through CanSAS community
  • Candidates for other test sample
    • Needs to be reproducible
  • Recruitment of participants
  • Further standards for intensity or momentum transfer?
  • Different ways of round robins
    • Blind can have a use
    • Revising data reduction, reported again, activity is useful
  • Talk about reduction in context of round robin

Notes from Discussion

General Discussion

Finished producing some drivers, running on SECoP: The Sample Environment Communication Protocol, ISSE, Octopies, told it does not work. Has been suggested that SECoP will not be interoperable at Oakridge - seems to not be fully standard as a protocol. EPICS drivers can be quite specific. Additional layer may be needed

CanSAS: Facility members used to not be nomadic (temporarily the case) - users may not care. Plug and play Glen Smales: Data from 17 different instruments, all different - Use of standard format not wide-spread Andrew Jackson, ESS: Todo on formats: No survey yet Eliot Gilbert (ANSTO) SASView and Mantid can save reduced data in Cansas Nexus. Uptake higher at Neutrons, less at synchrotrons 1d data, often put out as ASCII 2d data is more complicated - Laid groundwork is important Encourage adoption as a community For synchrotron SAXS, discussion with vendors may be needed.

Yun Liu (NIST): Is current practice viable for weak scattering? Push for throughput. Push limit in regards to intensity? Background is dominating in case of wake scatterers Reliance on calibration by vendors - understanding of typical calibration problems not uniform

Liz Kelley (NCNR): Errors in terms of counting statistics? Counting statistics is easy to account for, but other sources of errors are difficult to capture. Sharing of best practice would be great.

Elliot Gilbert (ANSTO): Link of existing videos? Original idea of the portal was to fill in blanks and link to existing resources.