Group4: Difference between revisions
From canSAS
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
NOTES FROM GROUP D | NOTES FROM GROUP D | ||
Yong Le Leading | |||
=== Discussed: === | === Discussed: === |
Revision as of 22:47, 8 June 2017
NOTES FROM GROUP D
Yong Le Leading
Discussed:
- Lack of tools and/or awareness thereof outside of biosas - In particular fitting and modeling tools
- Publishing best practice data correction for different standard types of measurements
- specially GI
- multiple scattering estimation and ways to handle
- Q and resolution standard
- More complex round robins
- Certification of range of validity of instruments?
- Database of corrected measurements for a wide range of materials with associated metada in NXcanSAS format preferably - maybe something like a like a PDB for materials? Or other? – good metadata important, tags need to be defined so you don't end up using different names for the same thing – new SLAC effort could potentially be co-opted for such a purpose?
- Uncertainties in multiple techniques fits
- Tools for multiple scattering would be useful
Top Thoughts for Going Forward
- Publishing best practice data correction and terminology for different standard types of measurements
- Database of corrected measurements for a wide range of materials with associated metada in NXcanSAS format preferably