AI Notes

From canSAS
Revision as of 17:05, 25 November 2024 by Butler (talk | contribs)

Notes from canSAS 2024 AI/ML in SAS Topical Presentation/Discussion

  • Talk
    • AI is pervasive
      • The most impactful AI applications will be outside he facility wall, these mostly demand good, reduced data
    • Decision ready data
      • bespoke GUI reduction is unnecessarily user-unfriendly, AND prevents future data-intensive work
    • Accessible documented API
      • Magic cable story
      • We should more regularly support outside decision engines as the 'center of the universe' with the instrument as a subordinate worker
  • Discussion
    • Andrew Jackson
      • Accessible documented API is good, public internet is not going to happen. All instruments should be able to be ‘plugged into’
    • Brian Pauw
      • Has solution for rolling nexus/NxCansas into scicat
    • Jan Ilavsky
      • Instrument control from open internet is not going to happen; decision is in wrong hands
      • Why not just use EPICS?
        • A: We’ve done that.
      • People hate tiled/bluesky
    • Unknown person
      • How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state?
        • A: This is a problem with the instrument. If the instrument can be put in that state, it’s the instruments problem
    • Unknown Person
      • How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications?
        • A: Good important question, no easy answers
    • Adrian Renee
      • Comment about “center of the universe”. Should be broader. All instruments should be switchable between these two views
      • How to get the users integrated into the decision making?
        • A: Human-machine interfaces is important. Code and efforts exists (Tsuchinoko)
    • Brian Pauw
      • We should support and push for instruments that aren’t the center of the universe
    • Tanny Chavez
      • Uncertainty quantification?
        • A: Yes, very important